The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 5, 2018, at around 13:04, the Defendant sent a photograph of the Kakao Stockholm message screen to the victim E by sending to the victim, who was received from the Dong Chang-dong Elementary School C, an elementary school, at around 14:10 on the same day, “E years have been divorced with her husband and the F is able to get off. I think it would be the male who would have been able to attend the school.” The Defendant sent a photograph to the Kaoo Stockholm message screen to the victim of the instant case.

2. The following facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court: (a) the Defendant, the victim, G, B, and H graduated from the same elementary school; (b) the Defendant attempted to compromise between G and the victim E; (c) the Defendant was aware that H would not compromise with G; (d) the Defendant would have known that H would not compromise with the victim; (e) the Defendant would have been a general secretary at an elementary school conference; (e) the auditor B; and (e) the Defendant would have asked the Defendant of the process that the victim would not compromise with G; (b) the Defendant appears to have sent the Defendant a photograph of the Kao message sent by H to C, etc. by sending the Defendant a speech sent by H to the victim during the process of explaining the reasons for not compromise. According to the Kakao message sent by the Defendant, the Defendant sent a photograph, such as the facts charged, and explained that the above message was the message made by H to have been transmitted to the victim, and the Defendant and the victim did not have any specific conflict with the victim.

It is difficult to see that the victim made the instant speech with knowledge that it may undermine the social evaluation of the personal value of the victim.

Therefore, prosecutors.