logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.07 2019가단560
사취금(소멸시효)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 20% from March 8, 2009 to September 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit for the purpose of the extension of prescription, even though the judgment based on the case was rendered by the Seoul Central District Court 2008Da450763, the Plaintiff and the Defendant as executive title. However, the Plaintiff did not receive repayment from the Defendant to a close range of 10 years from the date the judgment became final and conclusive.

2. Judgment by public notice under applicable Acts (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow