The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

In full view of the consistent and detailed statements of the victim (misunderstanding of facts), the circumstances leading up to the complaint, and the fact that it is difficult to see that the victim's statement was fabricated by one-book submitted by the victim, the credibility of the statement is found in the victim's statement.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. The lower court, based on the circumstances indicated in its reasoning, cannot be readily concluded that a forced indecent act, such as the facts charged, was actually committed on the basis of documents unilaterally prepared by the victim’s assertion or the victim.

The decision was determined.

In light of the circumstances described below in the detailed statement of the court below, the court below's decision on not guilty of this part of the facts charged is just and acceptable, and there is a violation of law of misunderstanding of facts.

shall not be deemed to exist.

This part of the prosecutor's argument is without merit.

The victim has received a written complaint from the defendant on July 18, 2018, which is the fact that the defendant had habitually committed an indecent act for not less than one year from the defendant at the Korean Maak Institute operated by the defendant, and the defendant is now taking lessons from the school now.

“A private teaching institute” and “A private teaching institute every day.”

“In the event of an agreement,” “I will give lessons.”

“Transmitting text messages”

In addition, the intention to continue to be in bad faith, apart from the fact of being forced to commit an indecent act, was expressed, and the victim committed an act that is difficult to see as ordinary to the victim due to a serious indecent act.

In addition, on July 20, 2018, the victim sent a text message to the effect that, considering the defendant's position, the victim set a minimum of KRW 2,750,000,000, which is a minimum of the agreement on forced indecent acts, in consideration of the defendant's position, and this court stated that the victim did not send such text message, and that her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she