1. The plaintiff (Appointed)'s claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Basic Facts

From February 3, 2012, the Plaintiff and the designated parties purchased total of KRW 26,020 shares of Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”) in total of KRW 387,567,00 from February 3, 2012, but sold the shares in total of KRW 157,558,500 on April 2, 2013.

The Selection F purchased and held KRW 143,809,390 in total, and sold the said shares in KRW 72,327,280 from February 3, 2012 to April 29, 2013.

The Selection G purchased the total of KRW 16,901,100 from February 8, 2012 to September 18, 2012, and sold the total of KRW 6,051,50 on April 9, 2013.

The Selected purchased 2,680 shares on February 15, 201 and held 2,680 shares on August 14, 201 to purchase 2,00 shares on August 14, 2013, and sold the total of 16,450 won per unit on September 5, 201 and sold E shares in total of 240,720 won per unit on September 5, 201.

Defendant E (hereinafter “E”)’s status as the Defendants is a corporation with the purpose of controlling the business activities of the subsidiaries through the holding of shares in the subsidiaries, and vessel management business.

Defendant B served as the president of Defendant I Group from May 2001 to February 2, 2014, and controlled the overall management of Defendant E and its subsidiaries.

Defendant C served from January 2008 to May 2013 as Defendant E’s CFO (the highest financial officer) and the representative director.

Defendant D served from January 2009 to May 201, 2013 as the head of the management planning office, injury, and headquarters of Defendant E.

The defendant Sam-gu accounting corporation is an accounting corporation that audited the financial statements of the defendant E- 36 and 37.

[Reasons for Recognition] A, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Gap's evidence Nos. 8-2 and 3-3, and the plaintiff's claim for damages under Articles 175 and 177 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (hereinafter "Capital Markets Act"), the plaintiff's claim for damages under Articles 175 and 177 of the same Act.