logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.05 2015고단1797
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1797"

1. On January 2008, the Defendant called the victim C at the Buddhist land and proposed to the effect that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the contract for the construction of electric power resource located in the Gyeonggi-do Seocheon City and Dong 2,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to contract the above house construction work from the beginning, and did not have any real estate inherited at the time, and could not repay the borrowed money to the victim according to the agreement because there was no particular property or source of revenue.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20 million from the victim as the borrowed money around January 17, 2008.

2. On January 29, 2008, the Defendant was demanded from the victim C (the age of 37) to pay the borrowed money on the contract basis as agreed in paragraph (1) while driving a car by obtaining D's franchise from the side road near the Geumdong Home Pungdong Home Pung-si in order to pay the borrowed money as agreed in paragraph (1).

The Defendant was knenee part of the victim’s right right knee, which is a dangerous object to gather the victim’s right right knee while leaving the front of the said car.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and put about about about 10 days of medical treatment to the right sleep, etc.

On August 5, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at a coffee shop stating that “The victim will give a subcontract for a new F hotel construction work in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to subcontract construction to the victim because he was not directly related to the above F hotel.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow