logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.06.18 2014고단1441 (1)
여신전문금융업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around December 201, the Defendant, D, E, F, and G copied the credit card using credit card information and a credit card reproduction device in the name of the non-foreigners in the name of the Defendant’s Ha, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the Defendant, D, E, F, and E were gathered to divide them into 45%, 45%, 45%, and 10%, and E were to divide them.

Accordingly, the Defendant shared the role of providing equipment, credit card information, all expenses, D as a credit card reproduction technician, the role of directly reproducing credit cards, F and E as a franchise store using a reproduced card, and G shared the role of providing a card terminal and a reproduced card. A.

On June 14, 2012, E, D, and F, according to the aforementioned prior public offering and action shares: (a) around 11:00 on June 14, 2012, the Defendant installed a reproduction program in the Nowon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by connecting the reproduction program to the Nowon-gu, and input credit card information received from the Defendant; (b) 5 copies of the credit card in the name of the non-sured in the name of the Defendant by preparing in advance and inputting the card information into the above reproduction; and (c) 5 times of using the credit card in the name of the non-sured in the name of the Defendant by inserting the card information. However, the credit card information was not used for any reason, such as not meeting the credit card information, and thus, attempted to forge the credit card but attempted to forge it.

B. Defendant, D, and E are above the end of June 2012.

The credit card was reproduced in the telecom with the same manner as the description, and was used five times in the above G office in the name of the false winner. However, the credit card was not used due to such reasons as not meeting the credit card information, and was attempted to forge the credit card but attempted to commit such act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. D. D.

arrow