logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.19 2018노2035
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the injury caused by dangerous driving) on the premise that the victim suffered an injury under the premise that the victim suffered an injury, misunderstanding of the legal principles, misunderstanding of the victim F and H suffered an insignificant increase in the degree of natural therapy without any special treatment due to the accident in this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Fact-finding, misunderstanding of legal principles, and evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below. ① on November 7, 2017, Y Hospital doctor Q&C issued a medical certificate that 2 weeks’s treatment was required for each of the above victims’ disease, namely, ① the victim F, under the victim F, under the victim F, the victim’s name “Manene’s base and tension, knenee’s kne’s base and tension, kne’s tyethy, multiple typhe’s ground, and multiple typhe’s base; ② the victims’ response from the victim’s disease to the point of view that the victim’s physical condition was damaged by the victim’s response to inquiries about the fact of the Y Hospital and the response to the National Health Insurance Corporation’s order to submit a report, etc., and the victim’s response was no different from the victim’s physical condition from the victim’s disease to the point of 10th day 17th day 17, 2017.

Since it is sufficient to recognize this part of the facts charged, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty is just, and the defendant's mistake and misapprehension of legal principles are without merit

B. Illegal consideration of sentencing, and the defendant in this case.

arrow