A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, and on November 4, 2010, under the grace period, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for two months at the Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, and a suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months at the Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, which became final and conclusive on January 17, 2011, and the said suspension of execution was invalidated, and on September 30, 201, the parole period passed on October 27, 201.

1. Fraud;

A. On June 12, 2012, around 03:30 on June 12, 2012, the Defendant ordered alcohol and sea wave to the victim D, operated by Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as if he would normally pay the food value to F, an employee.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the food value even if he/she ordered food because he/she had no money during the time.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving F, received from F the delivery of 13,00 won in its place of action 2 soldiers, sea guards, etc. in the amount of KRW 13,00.

B. At around 00:10 on June 2012, the Defendant ordered the I Net State operated by the Victim H located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to provide the victim with normal food values, as if the victim would normally pay the value of food to the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the food value even if he/she ordered food because he/she had no money during the time.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim a share of KRW 13,00,00 from the victim, a share of KRW 20,00.

C. On June 24, 2012, around 04:00, the Defendant ordered alcohol and sugar as if he would normally pay the value of food to the employees M, in L restaurants operated by the victim K in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the food value even if he/she ordered food because he/she had no money during the time.

The defendant deceivings M as such, and thereby, from M, 12.