logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.11.29 2019노5143
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(업무상위력등에의한추행)
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

The defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim.

The sentence of unfair sentencing (one-month imprisonment, one-year suspension of execution, 40 hours an order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture, 80 hours an order to provide community service) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

Judgment

In determining the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. supporting the facts charged, the court of the determination of the mistake of the facts by the defendant shall evaluate the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc., taking into account all the circumstances that are difficult to record in the witness examination protocol, including the appearance and attitude of the witness, and the penance of the statements made by the witness in the open court after being sworn before and after being sworn by the judge, as well as the appearance and attitude of the witness, and the penance of the statements made by the witness in the open court. In a case where the statements made by the witness, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, they shall not be dismissed without permission unless there is any separate evidence that may objectively deem the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc., are objectively consistent and consistent with the facts charged (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do7403, Sep. 9, 201). In addition, the defendant shall not refuse the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. (see, 2008Du108).

Although the victim's statement about the process of committing an indecent act and the content and method of an indecent act is consistent with the main part of the investigation agency from the time to the court of original trial, the F's statement that witness the scene of the crime is consistent with the victim's statement. The defendant points out.

arrow