beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 85,776,540 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money on February 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned 1) Plaintiff A is the owner of, and the person who was residing in, the building of 84.06 square meters on the land of the Dongdong-gu E-gu, Yandong-gu (hereinafter “the burning building of this case”). Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s child, who was residing in the burning building of this case. Defendant C is the owner of the second floor reinforced concrete structure of the 2nd floor above the south-gu, Dongdong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “the fire building of this case”) located adjacent to the burning building of this case. Defendant C is the owner of the apartment house of the 2nd floor above the building of this case. Defendant D is the husband and wife between Defendant C and Defendant C, and was residing in the fire
B. On February 10, 2018, around 09:51, a fire occurred in the instant fire building, and the instant burning building was moved to the instant burning building adjacent to a non-breadth, and the fire caused damage to the extent that its repair is impossible.
(hereinafter in this case).
As a result of the fire investigation conducted by the fire station in charge of the field investigation of the fire of this case, the fire of this case concluded that the fire of this case was being expanded to the burning building of this case, which is the building adjacent to the fire of this case at the time of arrival of the fire of this case. The fire of this case was presumed to be a fire that was caused by being adhered to combustible materials, such as shot boiler installed on the front side of the fire of this case (hereinafter the fire of this case) and the shot boiler installed on the front side of the fire of this case, and the shot boiler of this case was discovered around the fire of this case, and the fire of this case, from around 05:00 on February 10, 2018, stated that Defendant C operated the fire boiler of this case from around 05:00 to shot boiler of this case.
Defendant C’s criminal judgment against Defendant C, on January 15, 2019, was recognized to have committed the instant fire by negligence on the ground that Defendant C operated the chemical boiler installed behind the instant fire building without taking any measures, and caused the instant fire by negligence. 5,00,000 won.