beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of six months, Defendant C, D, and E shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On October 8, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in April due to a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 16, 2015.
[Criminal facts]
1. The Defendant established a company and registered as an individual entrepreneur even though he did not intend to actually operate the business at the tax office, but did not intend to do so, Defendant A established and registered an account under the name of the corporation, opened a passbook and physical card, which is an access medium connected to the said account, and opened a flexible intrusion in the name of the individual entrepreneur and the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the tax office, after registering the individual entrepreneur in the name of the Defendant at the tax office, and sold it to an irregular criminal organization that sells it through “G”, “loans,” “loans,” and “illegal sports discussions,” and the Defendant agreed to receive compensation therefor.
A. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) made a false application for registration of a corporation with the intent to establish and operate a corporation; (b) made a false application for registration of a corporation with no intent to establish and operate the corporation; and (c) made an application for registration of a corporation with no intent to establish and operate the corporation to a public official in charge of registration of the establishment of the corporation.
A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the computer system so that the registration of the establishment of the “H” corporation is completed on the corporate registry, and the said public official kept the computer system of the above corporate registry that recorded false facts as above.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the corporate register which is the same electronic records as the original copy of the fair deed, and exercised it by making it available for the computerized recording of the corporate register.