A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2014, the Defendant, at the Daejeon District Court, issued a summary order of KRW 100,000,000,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on October 20:42, 2019, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car with approximately 10km distance from the roads near the 198, Samdong-dong, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon to the roads in the Seogu, Seogu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong, to the roads in front of the Seogu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiries into inquiries and the application of a copy of judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is erroneous and contradictory to the defendant. However, despite the past record of being punished by a fine for drunk driving around around 2014, the drinking driving of this case was reached 0.093%, the blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving of this case was 0.093%, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and family relationship, the punishment as set forth