The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant does not have made a false testimony against his memory.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (a fine of four million won) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The court below testified to the effect that it is difficult to believe that D's testimony that D's witness had been unfilled because the defendant appeared as a witness in the case of injury to D', and that D's job structure did not go out of D's seat unless he turns out of D's seat, and that D's testimony to the effect that D's witness was unfasible; ② in the same case, D's, E' and I appeared to go out of the main place of week in order to see this, and it appears that D's testimony to the effect that D's witness was unfasible or 's witness was removed from the main place of week (i.e., the defendant appeared to go out of the main place of week when D's seat took place, and (ii) the defendant appeared to go out of the main place of week in the court below's testimony to the effect that D's testimony was made out of the main place of week, and (iii) the defendant's testimony to the extent that D's remaining outside of the main place of week in the court below's testimony.