The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal did not have committed the instant crime, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim C has made a statement about the process and method of causing injury to the victims in a consistent and detailed situation from the investigative agency to the court below's trial, and the victim's statement does not seem to be particularly contradictory or natural part, ② the victim's statement contains part of the victim's statement, which is contradictory or exaggerated to the victim's statement. However, there is no special inconsistency in the victim's statement in relation to the victim's damage as stated in the facts charged of this case. ③ The victim's image taken of the victim's body, it can be confirmed that the victim's victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's her son's son's son's statement and 308 evidence.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.