Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall lend any means of access in promising any compensation in the use and management of the means of electronic financial transactions.

On February 1, 2019, the Defendant, at C University Library located in Sinsan-si B, made a proposal that “I would make details of refund, prepare a purchase deliberation, and make a work related to the refund of goods, 100,000 won per day,” from a person whose name cannot be known by telephone,” and sent the file and password of an authorized certificate of Internet banking connected to a bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day to a person whose name cannot be known, for the purpose of employment, with the proposal that “I would raise the transfer limit up to 10 million won by transfer of personal information, account number, and authorized certificate.”

As a result, the Defendant promised to provide a means of access in return for an intangible expected profit that can be employed in the future, and lent it to a person with no name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Details of account transactions;

1. Application of the G dialogue content Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The term “loan of access media” under Article 49(4)2 of the pertinent Act and Articles 6(3)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act regarding criminal facts and Article 49(3)2 of the option of punishment [the term “the act of lending means lending a means of access to a means of access so that other persons may temporarily use the means of access without managing and supervising the user of the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising to receive compensation, or promising to do so, and the term “price” refers to economic benefits that correspond to the lending of the means of access (see Supreme Court Decision 2017Do16946, Jun. 27, 2019). In this case, the Defendant was to receive KRW 100,000 per day while performing the duties of refunding.