logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2002.09.27 2002고단286
도로법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 30.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a Track driver, and Defendant Samck Track Co., Ltd. is the owner of the above vehicle;

1. On November 17, 2001, Defendant A operated the Track Track from the water gold in Yangsan to the Hack-si, Defendant A violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by operating a vehicle with gross weight of more than 40 tons and a gross weight of more than 10 tons in order to preserve the structure of the road and prevent the danger of operation, even though the management agency limits the operation of the vehicle with gross weight of more than 40 tons and a gross weight of more than 10 tons, Defendant A violated the restrictions on the operation of the vehicle by operating a vehicle with gross weight of more than 42 tons, a gross weight of 1.8 tons,

2. The defendant Twitter Co., Ltd. committed the above violation in relation to the defendant's business at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, which is an employee of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement that conforms to the facts stated in this Court by the agents of Defendant A and Defendant C C;

1. Statement consistent with the facts described in the judgment among the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by Defendant A in the preparation of judicial police assistant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes that conform to the facts stated in the judgment, among written accusations for preparation of president of both mountainous districts;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 83 (1) 2 of the Road Act and Article 54 (1) of the same Act;

(b) Defendant Samm Track Stock Company: Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the Road Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act shall be confined in a workhouse (Defendant A);

arrow