The Defendants, among the buildings listed in the attached list, connect each point of the attached list 1-12 and 1, to the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff and defendant B entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter "the lease agreement of this case") on June 1, 2018 with respect to the lease deposit of 40 million won, 4.2 million won for the first year of monthly rent, 4.62 million won for the first year, 4.62 million won for the first year, 11th day for the rent, and 30 million won for the term of lease from July 11, 2018 to July 10, 2021. The plaintiff received from the defendant B the lease deposit of 40 million won, and the defendant B delivered the building of this case to the defendant Eul without the plaintiff's consent, and the defendant C transferred the building of this case to the defendant Eul for the reason that it was 200 million won for the termination of the lease agreement of this case from 200 million won to 201.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated on April 10, 202 with the overdue rent of not less than three months from Defendant B, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the building of this case to the Plaintiff. From the deposit deposit of 40 million won to August 10, 2020, the Defendant calculated the sum of the rent of 4,0160,00 won [4,20,000 won (460,000 won x 8 months (7 minutes from August 11, 2019 and 7 minutes from July 10, 2020)] from the deduction of the lease deposit of this case from the deposit of 40,000 won to the date of completion of the India building of this case. Thus, Defendant B is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the unjust enrichment of 4,000 won calculated on the above base date, from August 11, 2020 to the date of completion of the India building of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's objection against the defendants.