Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (37, female) who worked as a worker at the manufacturing factory of the Ulsan-gu building C, Ulsan-gu building C, and the victim E (37, female) who was employed at the manufacturing factory of the defendant's vehicle, and the victim E (the victim) who was employed at the manufacturing factory of the vehicle in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, and the victim's wages for one month in which he was not paid. The Defendant breadddd the victim's fat, fating the bat, fating the bats of the f (33, female) on several occasions, and fatd the victim's bat, fating the clothes of the f (n) on several occasions, making it over the floor of the bat and walking the bats,

As a result, victims E suffered injury that requires treatment for about 21 days, such as base salt and tension, and the victim F suffered injury that requires treatment for about 14 days, such as base salt and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of witness E in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. The defendant asserts that there was no fact that the defendant committed an assault, such as fating fat, etc. of victim E, but there was no fact of causing an injury, nor the fact of assaulting F itself.

However, the above evidence (the defendant stated that he was outside of the office of E as to the place where the F was exceeded, and the F stated that he was inside the office of office and that his entire statement was not reliable, but the defendant himself also saw the victim F to go out of the office of office.

In light of the above E and F’s circumstances and circumstances at the time of the statement, the F made a statement only when the Defendant was sealed, and the latter did not make any statement about the place where it was specifically exceeded, and it cannot be said that the above E and F’s statement is inconsistent, it is sufficiently recognized that the fact of injury was inflicted on the victims, such as the Defendant’s statement in its decision) is applicable to the law.

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment