A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a religious believers, is a person subject to enlistment in active service.

On October 28, 2017, the Defendant was given a notice of enlistment in active duty service under the name of the head of the Gyeonggi-do North Korean Branch Office to enlistment as an association located in the 28 association located in the erogical erogical erogical erogical erogical erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic erogic ero

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written accusation;

1. A written accusation of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of public notice of enlistment in active duty service;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion on criminal facts under Article 88 (1) 1 of the Military Service Act

1. The Defendant’s refusal to enlist in the military is conscientious objection and “justifiable cause to refuse enlistment”.

2. Determination

A. A. Religious and conscientious freedom is a relative freedom that can be restricted pursuant to Article 37(2) of the Constitution in a case where there exists a superior legal interest that justify such restriction. As such, Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act was prepared to specify the duty of national defense of the most fundamental citizen in the present situation where a division is in a decentralization, and as such, if the duty of military service is not properly performed and the national security is not performed, the dignity and value of the people’s human being cannot be guaranteed.

Therefore, the Defendant’s freedom of conscience cannot be deemed as superior value to the constitutional legal interest of guaranteeing dignity and value as a human being. Even if the Military Service Act restricts the Defendant’s religious and conscientious freedom, it is a justifiable restriction permitted under the Constitution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2009Do7120, Oct. 5, 2009; 2004Do2965, Jul. 15, 2004). (b) Since conscientious objection is generally recognized international law and is not accepted in Korea, it is not subject to criminal punishment for conscientious objectors under the instant legal provision.