The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are circumstances such as the fact that some of the victims of the judgment did not want the punishment of the defendant, the damaged goods were recovered, and the defendant repented and reflected the mistake of the crime of this case, and the defendant's health is not good.

However, on August 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and three years of suspended execution on August 28, 2012, and committed the instant crime only for four months during the suspended execution period.

The statutory penalty for the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes is imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years, and the lower court, taking account of the favorable circumstances favorable to the Defendant, determined the minimum imprisonment within the scope of the term of punishment, which is one year and six months, and there is no change in special circumstances or circumstances that may newly be considered in sentencing after the sentence

In addition, examining the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, and method and result of the crime, it is difficult to deem the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.