1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant would transfer the ownership of the land located in C in the original city to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff requested to lend KRW 200,000,000 to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff jointly lent KRW 200,000,000 to the Defendant on March 5, 2008 jointly with Nonparty D, and 20,000,000 interest rate of KRW 20,000 per annum (payment on December 31, 2008) was issued and delivered with the Defendant’s certificate of loan issued on December 31, 208. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff, a joint creditor, the interest rate of KRW 10,00,000, the Plaintiff’s interest rate of KRW 100,000,00, out of the above loans.

B. We examine the judgment of the court below, Gap evidence Nos. 1 (Evidence No. 1) and the defendant's statement in the defendant's part cannot be used as evidence because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity, and the remaining evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant borrowed from the plaintiff as alleged by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since there

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.