logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.08.27 2013고단1128
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On September 20, 2012, A was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on September 20, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 30, 201, and Defendant B was notified of a summary order of a fine of five million won in the Suwon District Court for fraud on November 22, 201.

On September 2009, in purchasing the Seo-gu Incheon apartment C apartment 206 Dong 102, the Defendants conspired to obtain a loan from the bank by getting a bad credit trader and purchasing the above apartment in the name of another person upon request from D to ask for the nominal purchaser of the above apartment, and after getting the old and the old and the old to the nominal lender, submitted the false business registration document in the name of E, and let the seller of the above apartment to obtain a loan from the bank.

The Defendants, around September 29, 2009, had D enter into a sales contract for the above apartment building with D as buyer, and Defendant A introduced E through F and G around October 12, 2009, upon introduction on or around October 15, 2009, had E open the agricultural bank account in its name and received it.

After October 15, 2009, the Defendants filed a business loan of KRW 227 million with the above apartment as security at the victim Solomon Savings Bank Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and submitted a business registration certificate of SH located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is a joint business proprietor while engaging in the act as if the above E would have received a loan and repaid the loan.

However, the facts are that E has submitted false documents as if it operates I to obtain a loan even though he is living in a old-age without a certain occupation, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan.

From October 16, 2009, the Defendants deceiving the victim, thereby deducting 120,530,000 won of the existing loans to the above apartment from the victim.

arrow