logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.27 2013나38083
성공보수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are that the plaintiff and the defendant (appointed party) did not clearly agree on the standards for "when delegated affairs have been successful," while entering into the delegation contract of this case. In the event the appellate court's judgment was reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court's ruling, the appellate court's power of attorney of the case before remanded to the court of first instance shall be too excessive after the remand of the case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 62Da792, Jan. 31, 1963; 84Hu102, May 28, 198; 98Ra168, Jul. 29, 198). The plaintiff, as an expert, is not a legal expert, at the appellate court's conclusion of the delegation contract of this case and at the same time, at the same time, at the same time, at the same time the plaintiff's judgment was reversed by the court of second instance, for the plaintiff's failure to return the case to the court of second instance's judgment."

arrow