The part against the plaintiffs falling under the amount ordered to be paid under the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the parents of Nonparty Mad Co-inheritors (hereinafter “the deceased”), who are co-inheritorss of the deceased, and the Defendant is the local government that manages Seo-gu Daejeon Ebridge (hereinafter “the instant road”) in which the instant accident occurred, as seen below.

B. On September 2, 2014, at around 22:44, the Deceased driven a Dgallon-ro balone vehicle owned by himself, and then felled under 5 meters following the road, and died of a heavy emulated damage and a plehion damage, by falling down at a speed of about 74 km per hour, depending on two-lanes of the road in which the two-lane roads of the Seo-gu Daejeon Eg-gu, Daejeon are opened from the egradic bank to the Eup/Myeon (at that time, the provision speed of the accident point at the point is 60 km per hour). At the end of the bridge at the end of the bridge, the vehicle was rapidly deprived of the center at the right edge of the road by leaving the road with the width of the ballon-ro and the width of the road, and then falling under the 5 meters following the road, falling under the direction below the 5 meters following the road.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

At the time of the accident of this case, the surface was milched because the accident of this case was boomed.

The point of the accident in this case is the road bended by the left-hand side when seen from the direction of the vehicle of the deceased, and the right-hand rail is a back at a level of 5 meters below the right-hand rail.

At the time of the accident in this case, the Ebridged line (the direction of the vehicle of the deceased in the Eup in the new Jindo, i.e., the direction of the vehicle of the deceased) installed the safety signs “Safety Signs of the Ebridges to reduce the speed at the time of sudden sudden reduction, exclusive road, motorway, prohibition of overtaking, sturging, visual sturging, snow sturging, softening caution, fire-fighting warning, etc., and a rewing machine.”

[Ground of recognition] Each description and image of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 5, 12, 16, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 4 through 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the appraisal by the court appraiser I, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the accident of this case occurred, the defendant, the manager of the road of this case, is the vehicle.