[Attachment 1] 1 to 7 of [Attachment 1] No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant, and 2-D of the judgment;

(e) ;

(f)each of the foregoing;

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 15, 2010, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Suwon District Court’s detention center on February 3, 2013.

In light of the fact that the defendant is in a position as the team leader of the Weather Team Co., Ltd. and that there is an unfavorable position for a vehicle violating traffic regulations, such as traffic signal violations, central invasions, and reverse driving, in the event of an accident involving a vehicle violating traffic regulations, such as a criminal and civil liability, the driver of the vehicle is charged with criminal charges, and the driver of the vehicle is charged with civil liability, he/she causes an accident involving the rear vehicle by taking the front of the vehicle with his/her own vehicle or stopping the vehicle, and the other driver of the vehicle under this paragraph shows the box image installed on his/her vehicle, and at the same time he/she receives the insurance money for the purpose of medical treatment, agreement, repair expenses, etc. from the insurance company subscribed to the vehicle.

1. On August 27, 2014, the Defendant’s sole criminal driving of the Defendant found that, from the long distance in front of the modern apartment located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Hyundai apartment, the Defendant driven D, and the F Costast, which the Defendant driven by the Marina-si in the signal, did not delay at a speed on the left side of the signal, and started from the day before his front line signal was changed to the straight line, the front front portion of the above passenger car was turned ahead of the Defendant’s car driver’s seat, and the Defendant displayed the black-box image installed in his car to the mobile phone, and was committed as if the Defendant was the victim, such as whether to recognize the violation of the signal, whether to report it to the police, or not, whether to report it to the police.

However, in fact, the defendant is thought to receive insurance money even though he could have avoided the accident by reporting that the above vans violated the signal.