logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.09.02 2019가단523764
기타(금전)
Text

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 17,445,00 as well as 5% per annum from October 31, 2017 to December 7, 2019 and the next day.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the annexed sheet.

2. Determination

A. The part acknowledged as principal 1) recognizes only the amount confirmed by the Plaintiff’s demand for performance by its workers, a summary order (violation of the Labor Standards Act due to delayed payment of wages, violation of the Labor Standards Act, violation of the Suwon District Court 2018 High Court 24637) against the Plaintiff. The amount is as follows (A). C. 3.250,00 won (A. 2) and D. 2.2.2 million won (A-1, Suwon District Court 2018 Suwon District Court 2029), E. 3.80,00 won (A. 5-2, A6, Suwon District Court 200,000 won (the above summary order), F. 6.2 million won, G5,415,00 won (A. 6, and the above summary order) and each of the above parts exceeds the above part of recognition by the Plaintiff’s submission of evidence is insufficient.

B. The Plaintiff claimed damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from the day after the date of delivery of the copy of the complaint, but the interest rate of 12% per annum as stipulated in the main text of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Presidential Decree No. 29768)

C. According to the theory of lawsuit, the defendant is the plaintiff.

(1) On October 31, 2017, the amount of KRW 17,445,00 as stated in paragraph (1) and its amount of KRW 17,45,000, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay damages for delay at each rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from the date the Plaintiff seeks to deliver a copy of the complaint of this case to December 7, 2019, and 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

3. The plaintiff's claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow