1. On April 15, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of rejecting the report on construction of structures against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 23, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a written report on the construction of a structure with a height of 22 meters, length of 30.7 meters, and size of 675.7 square meters on the instant land, which is owned by B, C, D, E, F, and G (hereinafter “instant land”). On June 23, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a written report on the construction of a reinforced concrete structure of 4,113 square meters in height (hereinafter “instant land”).

(hereinafter referred to as “the report on the instant construction”). (b)

On June 25, 2015, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to supplement the “Report on Safety and Salvage Review”, and around that time, the Plaintiff submitted the “Report on Examination of Safety and Reinforcement of Omissions”, which was prepared by requesting the Defendant to the Defendant by the Jinjin Co., Ltd.

The above review report contains a review of the stability of the slope of the land of this case, which the plaintiff intends to install the retaining wall of this case, and a plan and design to reinforce it.

C. On July 8, 2015, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to supplement the following content:

1. Since the construction of the retaining wall of this case is subject to the review and processing of the construction report on a structure under Article 83 (2) of the Building Act and the permission for development activities under Article 56 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”), an application for permission for development activities and required documents shall be submitted to the department for reporting the construction of a retaining wall (construction) pursuant to Article 6 (1) 3 of the Enforcement Rule of the Building Act.

2. According to the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, the slope of the instant land needs to secure more overall aesthetic view of the stone collection site in view of geographical location as well as safety as part of the I stone collection site as part of the I stone collection site as well as geographical location, such as location in J, which is the official book of the Seoul Southern part of the Seoul Southern part. Therefore, it is reasonable to comprehensively review the permission of development in accordance with the stone collection ground maintenance plan and the utilization plan of the said site in consideration of scenic view.

3. For reference, it is easy to eliminate the slope of the site.