The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one-year imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized all crimes and reflected all is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

The nature of the crime is bad in light of the method and frequency of each of the crimes in this case.

In addition, the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the same type of Internet fraud crime, and committed each of the crimes in this case in the grace period.

In light of the criminal records and criminal habits of these defendants, the risk of recidivism is high.

Since there is a need to punish the defendant strictly.

There was no agreement with the victims.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too excessive and is not deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.