logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고정1451
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 6, 2017, around 07:30 on the road in front of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, stated the facts charged as “in the section of about five meters,” but the Defendant driven the degree of 80cm.

The evidence asserts that, although the accurate distance is not specified, the facts of driving in a section not exceeding five meters are recognized. Thus, the identity of the facts charged is not undermined and the defendant's right to defense is modified ex officio to the extent that it does not hinder the defendant's right to defense. The C-ri-ri vehicle was driven under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.178% in blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s drinking volume of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the fact that the Defendant caused a traffic accident by the instant crime, etc., the driving distance is shorter (the reasons why the driving distance is shorter is caused by traffic accident); (b) the Defendant has no criminal history of the same kind; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal records, criminal records, means and results of the instant crime; and (d) the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is too excessive even if all the sentencing conditions specified in the instant trial process, such as the Defendant’

It does not seem that it does not appear.

arrow