Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 8, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Daegu District Court.

[2] On October 31, 2020, the Defendant driven a F K7 vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling to 0.070% of alcohol leveling from around 200 meters to around 23:05 to around 200 meters from the frontway in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu-gu to the same Gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to refer to inquiries, such as criminal history, and to reports on investigation (verification of the same type of force);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 17371 of Jun. 9, 2020) on criminal facts

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, motive and means of crime, results, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing as stated in the argument of this case, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances.

The defendant, even though he had been subject to punishment three times due to drinking, was driving at once again after the enforcement of the current Road Traffic Act, which greatly strengthened the control standards and statutory penalty.

The alcohol concentration in the blood of the defendant is not lower than 0.070%.

A favorable circumstances: The Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and disposed of a motor vehicle operated by making the Defendant not to repeat the crime again.

The distance operated by the defendant does not change.

Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for at least ten years since around May 2008, and Defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine.