beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's supplementary intervenor's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of the appeal shall be the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 22:00 on May 2, 2014, B driven a vehicle owned by the Defendant C (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”) and entered the two lanes of the two-lane road located in the direction of the luminous map office in the direction of the lusio map, in the direction of the lusio map, in the direction of the lusium, the said lusium was moving back to the lusium in the direction of the lusium branch before reaching the lusium branch. On the other hand, B did not find D, which was under the influence of alcohol and the Plaintiff’s supplementary participant, flusing the lusium, led the Plaintiff’s Intervenor to the instant vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s supplementary intervenor was facing the lusium part of D’s bridge, and the Plaintiff’s supplementary intervenor fell back to the direction of the instant vehicle after the lusium.
(hereinafter referred to as "the accident of this case". (b)
According to the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor paid KRW 15,654,740,00 to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s medical expenses incurred from the instant accident by February 9, 2015, pursuant to the instant comprehensive insurance contract with respect to vehicles E entered into with the Plaintiff’s Intervenor, the Plaintiff paid KRW 15,654,740, in total, to the Plaintiff’s medical expenses incurred from the instant accident, and received KRW 5,000,000 from Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., the insurer of the instant vehicle, as the insurer of the instant vehicle.
C. B was sentenced on January 9, 2015 to imprisonment without prison labor for 6 months and one year of suspended execution for violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents due to the instant accident (hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”).
(Case No. 2014 Highest 825 of Changwon District Court). [Ground of Recognition] / [Case No. 2014 Highest 825 of Changwon District Court] / [Ground of Recognition] / Except for the cases where Gap separately indicates the number of evidence No. 1 to 5, Gap or Eul, 3, 5, 7, Eul, 1, 2, 4 through 9, 11.