A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2015, around 20:54, the Defendant served a police box in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, which was an issue of trial expenses for taxi drivers. However, at the above police box, the Defendant was able to take measures to return home from police officers such as security guards D during night duty.

The Defendant is a police officer who is bitched of a bitch.

p. Doz. police.

Drhe or she takes the brusation of the body of D in the brusation E and the brusation of the chest while taking a bath, such as Dr. He or she takes the brusation of the Defendant on several occasions on the defective floor in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and he or she must kill the Defendant on the brusation of the brusation of the brus. He or one brusation of the brusation.

V. I see this ar. Omission, Ispatus

“In doing so,” the police officer threatened.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., that the defendant reflects his/her mistake, and that