logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.29 2014가단18250
소유권확인
Text

1. The Plaintiffs’ share ratio of the attached Form 1269 square meters per the wife population G is according to the ratio of shares in the attached Form 1 of the inheritance shares.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The deceased H (H, 182, death on April 18, 1912) had the deceased I (I, 1903, death on March 12, 1956), and the deceased I had the deceased K with the deceased J (J, 1929, death on March 5, 2001) and the south of Korea, and the deceased K with the deceased. The deceased J married with the Plaintiff A, followed the Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F as their children.

B. The network I succeeded to the network H and the network J, which was the head of the network I, respectively, to the network I, and upon the death of the network J, the plaintiffs jointly succeeded to the network J's properties.

(H and I died when the Civil Code was applied, and in respect of inheritance, the customary law was applied to the heir of the first-class property.

On December 11, 1911, the land survey book prepared during the Japanese occupation period is written by H (H) having a domicile in Yan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, with the area of 1269 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The claim for confirmation of land ownership against the state of interest in confirmation is a benefit of confirmation only when the land is unregistered and its land is not registered, or when the registrant is unknown, or when there are special circumstances, such as the State's refusal of ownership by a third party, who is a titleholder of registration or registration, and the State continues to assert state ownership (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 93Da58738, Dec. 2, 1994). The land of this case is not only indicated in the land to recover the landowner on the land cadastre, but also the land of this case is also indicated in the land to recover the landowner on the land cadastre, and since the defendant, who is the State, denies the plaintiffs' ownership while disputing the identity of H, who is the real name of the

B. A person who is assessed as a landowner in a land survey project conducted under the Land Survey Order during the Japanese colonial Period on the merits.

arrow