logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.11.30 2017누11273
과징금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 4 of Part 22, "No later than December 31, 19," in Part 4, "No later than December 31, 200," "No. 4," in Part 7, "No. 4, "No. 4, 18, and No. 19," was added to the following: 5, "D" was prepared and submitted to the plaintiff a work day (No. 10, No. 11) and the plaintiff was submitted to the plaintiff. The plaintiff argued to the effect that "No. 12," but according to witness witness witness witness witness witness witness witness witness testimony, "D appears to have reported to the apartment management office of apartment, not the plaintiff," and "No. 4, "No. 4," in Part 4, "No. 4, as the witness witness witness testimony of the trial," and the plaintiff was deemed to have been unable to receive the plaintiff's final management and supervision of the remaining documents, as long as it was difficult for the plaintiff to know the completion of work from D and work.

The council of occupants' representatives held each of the documents of this case to the council of occupants' representatives in the opinion that the subcontract amount was too small for children.

Note 88 was made.

7. The plaintiff sent to the head of Busan Regional Construction and Management Administration.

arrow