logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.08.11 2017고단756
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 6, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property by breaking the door door of Kimchi cooling-p in an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000,00 in the market value owned by the victim, as the victim was prevented from receiving the phone in order to demand money from the victim, even though the victim was phoneed to demand money from the victim, and as the victim was prevented from receiving the phone, the Defendant destroyed the property by breaking the door.

The defendant continued to send a Kimchi cooling-gu photograph to the third person or E, and followed the victim's contact. However, the defendant did not contact from the injured party, and then damaged the victim's market price in the sum of KRW 600,000,000 as the market price of the victim's possession.

2. On June 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the location described in No. 1-A (a) around June 7, 2017, the Defendant: (b) caused damage to the victim’s property by cutting off one set of 200,000 won in the market price of the victim’s ownership, one consignee in the market, and one set of 100,000 won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D, F, G, and H;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 369 (1), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( considered that family members who are victims are not punished by the defendant);

1. The part dismissing public prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation;

1. Although the Defendant demanded money from the victim D and F, G, E, H, and I (in the case of the remainder of the complainants other than the victim D, a disposition that does not have the right of prosecution on the same day) with respect to siblings, the Defendant was willing to threaten the victim, etc. who did not give money to the victim.

A. On April 2, 2017, the Defendant was at the house of the Defendant, located in JJ building 203, Hasan-si, Hasan-si, and G.

arrow