The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person driving a ESF station or another car.

On January 9, 2011, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 20-30 kilometers on the two-lanes of the Do 20-30 kilometers from the upper half-distance road in Ansan-si. Around 02:40, the Defendant tried to drive the above vehicle and drive the front of the F-distance road in the direction of the private road in the middle-distance.

At the time, the driver's duty of care to check whether there are other vehicles and to drive safely according to the new code, since the driver's duty of care is a person engaged in the driver's duty, since the driver's duty of care was night and the front door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of violating the signal while neglecting this, the victim G driving which proceeds from the right side of the vehicle to the left side of the vehicle of the defendant was led to the front side of the vehicle's front front part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the driver G of the victimized vehicle, such as salt ties and tensions, which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment, from the driver G of the victimized vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, to the Defendant I (the 43 years of age and women) for approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserted consistently from the police investigation stage to the trial of the case, and the Defendant was denied the charges by asserting that he driven a vehicle according to the cross-section signal, and that G, the other party to the accident, violated the signal and caused the instant accident.

B. 1) The direct evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case includes the witness G’s statement in this court and each statement in the police interrogation protocol against G, and it is difficult to believe it as it is in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record. G driving the vehicle at the speed of proceeding, considering that it was a direct progress signal at the time the instant intersection took place.