The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The decision of the court below on the grounds of appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The crime of this case is highly likely to be criticized because the defendant committed a similar rape while the victim, who is a workplace club, was able to escape from alcohol due to the regrasing of the victim's money house, and the victim was locked after the victim's money house.

As a result, the victim seems to have suffered sexual humiliation along with physical and mental impulses, and the president of the workplace was punished by the defendant, so the president of the workplace was retired from his/her workplace, thereby resulting in secondary damage.

However, when the defendant was found to be guilty, the defendant is seriously against the confession of the crime of this case, and the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant longer than the victim by mutual consent with the victim.

The defendant has never been subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime.

그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 가족관계, 범행의 동기, 범행의 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 이 사건 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건과 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위( 징역 1년∼ 징역 2년) ◇ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년∼ 징역 15년 ◇ 양형기준상 권고 형량 [ 유형의 결정] 성범죄 > 일반적 기준 > 강간죄 (13 세 이상 대상) > 제 1 유형( 일반 강간) [ 특별 양형 인자] - 감경요소: 처벌 불원 [ 권고 영역의 결정 및 권고 형의 범위] 감경영역, 징역 1년 ∼ 징역 2년( 성년 유사 강간이므로 제 1 유형에 포섭하되, 형량범위의 상한과 하한을 2/3 로 감경) 등을 종합하여 보면, 원심의 피고인에 대한 형은 무거워서 부당 하다고 판단된다.

The defendant's appeal is with merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is reasonable, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal is again made after pleading as follows.