Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2016 High 668" shall collect, use, or provide location information on an individual or mobile object without the consent of the individual or owner thereof.

On May 2016, the Defendant collected the location information of the said vehicle, which is a portable object, by attaching a location tracking device to the EM520 vehicle owned by the victim, who was parked there, in front of the victim D's house located in Pyeongtaek-si C, and without the victim's consent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to petition for accusation and photograph of location;

1. Article 40 of the relevant Act on the Protection, Use, etc. of Location Information regarding criminal facts and Article 40 subparagraph 4 and Article 15 (1) of the Act on the Protection, Use, etc. of Alternative Location Information, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. Facts charged (2016 High Court 573) The Defendant is the husband of the Victim F (F, female, 42 years old), and the victim D (39 years old) is a person in a relationship with F.

On May 26, 2016, the Defendant reported the appearance of the victims before the Helel located in Pyeongtaek-si G to walk on the road. On May 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) assessed the head once after the victim D; (b) taken the head once; (c) taken a drinking face, tree, etc.; and (d) taken the face of the victim F.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D, such as chilled tensions, tensions, etc. requiring the treatment of about two weeks, and injury on the victim F, such as damage of sins that require the treatment of about two weeks.

2. Determination

A. The part D in which the Defendant was injured by F was unable to view that the Defendant was at the time when the Defendant was F in the court

The statement, in the court, D was first made by the defendant and was made to F.

F. F. F. F. F. A. H.D. for its first time

The statement is in conflict with each other, and F is the first time when the defendant is in conflict with the legal statement in the investigative agency.