All the judgment below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for twelve years.

Sexual assault against the defendant for 120 hours.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고사건 부분 ⑴ 사실오인 주장 ㈎ 청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(청소년강간등), 아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음) 부분 피고인 겸 피부착명령청구자(이하 ‘피고인’이라 한다)는 피해자 C과 ‘합의’하여 위 피해자의 몸을 만지거나 성관계를 한 것이고, ‘위력으로’ 위 피해자를 추행하거나 간음한 사실이 없다.

㈏ 각 아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등추행) 부분 피고인은 별지 범죄일람표1 순번 1, 2, 4, 5와 같이 피해자 H을 추행한 사실이 없고, 순번 3의 경우에는 술김에 우발적으로 위 피해자의 가슴을 1회 만졌을 뿐 피해자를 추행하지는 않았다.

㈐ 각 상해 부분 별지 범죄일람표2 순번 2, 3의 경우, 피해자 F가 스스로 넘어져서 다친 것일 뿐이고, 피고인이 위 피해자에게 상해를 가한 것이 아니다.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one-twelve years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

Article 12(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the court below ordered the defendant to disclose and notify the personal information for 10 years.

B. It is unreasonable to order the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for 20 years, even though the Defendant did not commit a sexual crime against many and unspecified persons, even though he/she did not commit a sexual crime.

2. Determination

A. We examine ex officio determination (i.e., the defendant's case) prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

First of all, Article 1-A of the judgment of the court below.

Since the crime described in paragraph (1) was committed at the spring border in 2009, it is limited to imprisonment by applying the main text of Article 42 of the former Criminal Code (amended by Act No. 10259, Apr. 15, 2010).