1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won;

2. Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 13, 2015, the Defendant damaged the said taxi by cutting the crosswalk on the front of the Cheongju University University located in 879, as the petition was in front of the Cheongju University located in the Cheongju University located in 879 on May 13, 2015, the Defendant destroyed the said taxi by getting off the said crosswalk due to the rain taken by the victim C (29 years old) who entered the said crosswalk, making it possible for the said taxi to get off the front of the said taxi, the front gate, the front gate, and the bitle, and the bitle to the said 1.720,000 won.

2. On May 13, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim by driving the said taxi directly from a police officer belonging to the Cheongju Party E on the petition of Cheongju, who was dispatched to the said place after receiving a report around 02:10 on May 13, 2015, and hearing the speech that the said taxi would go to the E zone and going to go to the E zone, making the victim take the face of the victim one time by drinking and leaving the victim’s left shoulder with a rain.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the police against C or the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report the occurrence of a case, estimates, damaged goods, and photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant for the reasons of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention of the workhouses, a fine prescribed in a summary order does not seem to have been excessive in light of the background, content, degree of punishment of the victim, etc. of each of the instant offenses, and thus, the punishment as set forth in the said order shall be determined as ordered