logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.03.09 2016고단6230
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On March 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Changwon District Court on March 14, 201, and on October 4, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of four million won for the same crime and was sentenced to a fine of four million won or more for drinking.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 27, 2016, Defendant 2016, Defendant 6230 driven BM3 automobiles with approximately KRW 300 meters up to 125 m3m in the same city-style 125 street at an influent place under the influence of alcohol content of around 07:10 on September 27, 2016.

2. The Defendant 2017 Highest 8 was a person who had the aforementioned two or more times of drinking driving skills, and appears to be erroneous in the written indictment on December 4, 2016, “ December 14, 2016.” The Defendant did not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of right to defense, and thus ex officio recognized as above.

Around 15:50, a vehicle BM3 is driven while under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.110% from the front of a cafeteria to the front road of the same city at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 6230]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol driving;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. He/she shall make a statement on the circumstances of a driver driving, and inquire about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report, and summary order-making statute, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense under the relevant provisions of the Act (or selection of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - Unfavorable circumstances: Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content 0.117% in blood on September 27, 2016 even though he/she had been punished several times for a traffic-related crime.

arrow