logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가단64652
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Ulsannam-gu C Apartment 105 Dong 2902 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On September 3, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff, setting the lease term of the instant apartment from the Plaintiff to October 10, 2012, and the lease deposit amount to KRW 240 million (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

The defendant paid the above lease deposit to the plaintiff and resided in the above apartment from October 2012.

C. The instant lease agreement was terminated upon the expiration of the term, and the Defendant was a director in the instant apartment on October 10, 2014, and on the same day, the Plaintiff returned KRW 230 million to the Defendant out of the lease deposit.

After confirming the inside of the apartment in this case on October 13, 2014, the Plaintiff confirmed the inside of the apartment in this case and, on October 13, 2014, required to make the Defendant enter the Defendant, with a thickness to make the Defendant enter the Defendant, with four strings and four strings and the strings of the strings, such as an apartment-sing-in-sing-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in-s-in

'The text message sent the Defendant a text message, and on October 15, 2014, the Defendant returned the remainder of the lease deposit KRW 10 million to the Defendant.

E. On October 20, 2014, the Plaintiff sent text messages demanding compensation to the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff sent the instant apartment to the Defendant: (b) the processed matter and the bad odor should be replaced too severely; and (c) the same shall apply to the case.

F. At the time of residing in the apartment of this case, the Defendant was at the time of living in the apartment of this case, and died on April 20, 2014.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 5, Eul evidence 1 and 11, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof

A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion (1) the apartment floor, scam, etc. of the apartment of this case, which is a tree of the height of the height of the apartment of this case.

arrow