1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 29, 2015, the Plaintiff, along with B, established and operated the “C Research Institute” in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”), and operated the instant private teaching institute solely from June 1, 2017.

The registration certificate of the establishment and operation of the instant private teaching institute is written as the “private teaching institute for lifelong education and training” and the “marization-making” of the curriculum.

B. On May 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) conducted a fact-finding survey on the instant private teaching institute; (b) determined that the Plaintiff operated the curriculum of non-registered teaching (broadcasting-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A

(hereinafter referred to as “pre-service disposition”). (c)

After conducting a fact-finding survey on the instant private teaching institute on November 16, 2017, the Defendant determined that the Plaintiff still operated the curriculum of non-registered teaching (broadcasting-Argo).

Accordingly, on December 20, 2017, the defendant imposed 50 points to the plaintiff and imposed 45 days of suspension of teaching (from January 1, 2018 to February 14, 2018) on the plaintiff.

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). 【The ground for recognition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s Disposition of this case’s No. 1, Gap’s No. 1, Eul’s No. 1, 2, and 4

2. An entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

3. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant private teaching institute is merely engaged in the class of “tactical”, such as the development, development, respiratory, rhym, and rhym for becoming a broadcaster, such as Agrriter, and cannot be deemed to have operated the extra-registration curriculum. 2) The Plaintiff merely registered the curriculum as “tact-hymological” in accordance with the instruction of the public official in charge, and the Plaintiff was unaware of the fact that there was the curriculum of “broadcasting-hymical” at the time.

Nevertheless, it is unreasonable for the Plaintiff to take the disposition of this case on the ground that it operates the extra-registered curriculum.

3..