The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and 200,000 won) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and against his mistake, there is a family member to support the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant first testified about the crime of this case in the course of being investigated by the investigative agency for the crime of this case and voluntarily surrenders to the police officer.

However, in light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by the distribution and medication of narcotics, the crime of this case requires strict punishment for narcotics offenders and eradicates them. In particular, the defendant spreads the path distance from the angle of the crime caused by the administration of philophones.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant was arrested in the course of unafusing another person’s vehicle which was stopped without permission; (b) the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment including a large number of narcotics crimes; (c) there is no special change of circumstances to newly consider after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, means and method of crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; (d) the method and method of crime; and (e) the equity of sentencing conditions indicated in the pleadings; and (e) the degree of sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Commission; and (e) the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.