The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence, and community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the Defendant to make a confession of and reflect against the instant crime, the instant crime in violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act not only harms to employees engaged in the relevant business by impairing the order of petroleum distribution, but also causes secondary damage, and is likely to cause a wide range of national and social damage, such as environmental pollution, etc. The Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he had been punished three times (three times of fine) due to the same crime, and the Defendant attempted to conceal the instant crime by failing to properly disclose the purchaser of the vehicle used in the instant crime. The Defendant attempted to conceal the instant crime. The equity between the instant crime and the punishment similar to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the environment, the means and method of the instant crime, and the motive of the instant crime, etc. are considered, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, and therefore, is not justified.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.