logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.08.08 2018고단475
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2018, at around 17:00 on March 2, 2018, he/she drinks alcoholic beverages on the side table table, while he/she had two influences and two influences as well as two influences on the C cafeteria in the following city B;

D and two other people blickly expressed a great voice, such as "Sews for the elderly in weather," and expressed a desire to pay and leave the victim's drinking value, such as "Sews E, the same year for the elderly in weather," etc., even if the victim E, who is the owner of the business, demanded the victim to pay and leave the drinking value, the victim continued to be in the state of failing to pay the drinking value and interfered with the victim's business operation by force by force, such as taking the bath to the customer and the main owner of the business.

2. Around 18:30 of the same day as indicated in the above paragraph 1, the police official, who was dispatched after having received a report at the same place as indicated in the above paragraph 1, notified F, the police official, to the effect that the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, which is not a bitch bitch bitch bitch, could be punished for the offense of insult because of the lack of a principal nature, even though the notice was given that “the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” it continued to engage in a bath while the customer and the business owner

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement made to the owner of the business shall be the same as his/her will, and the same shall apply where a police officer takes care of the case and takes a bath to do so;

Jinal)

1. Each written statement of F, D, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, investigative report (Attachment to such images);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the selection of each fine concerning the crime;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of fines prescribed for the above two crimes is added];

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) committed the instant crime again even though the Defendant had had the same record of committing the same offense.

It is better to insult police officers in the course of performing their duties.

arrow