The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case in collusion with A, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment below, is the crime of this case, which the defendant acquired 5 million won from victim I and 20 million won from victim N, and the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and the defendant committed a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act around 2008 and around 2009, a fine of one million won is imposed, and there is no other criminal power as well as a fine of two million won.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the victims agreed with or did not pay the victims the amount of damage until the time of the trial; (b) the court below appears to have determined the punishment by fully taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendants; and (c) there was no change of circumstances that could have different from the judgment of the court below from the punishment of the court below when the court below reached this court; (d) the result of the application of the sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court (the scope of recommending punishment: between June and January 6) and other circumstances, including the defendant’s age, character and behavior, the background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.