1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff concluded a fire insurance contract with 1.201 square meters (92.93 square meters, among 659.98 square meters, of the total floor area of multi-household housing with the 4th floor above the 1st floor below the 1st floor of steel reinforced concrete structure slive slive roof) with the subject of insurance, 2. A fire insurance contract with the subject of insurance with the 302 square meters (103.394 square meters, among the total floor area of 1,568.22 square meters, 103.3 square meters, among the total floor area of the 9th floor above the 1st floor below the 1st floor below the 4th floor below the 1st floor below the 19th floor below the 568.22 square meters below the 1st floor below the 1st floor below the 1st floor of the E and Jeju, with the insurance subject of insurance with the F apartment and Jeju 901 square meters below the 198.25 square meters below the 298.201 square meters below

(b) On April 19, 2015, around 14:50, at Jeju, gas explosion accidents in subparagraph 201 of G 2nd floor G G 201, which occurred, and due to the shock, destroyed the windows, etc. at the residence of A, C, E, and F living in the vicinity of the said G, and the household Dogs were destroyed by a wave or have been sunken by an inner string.

(hereinafter “instant explosion accident”). C.

From May 18, 2015 to July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30,033,301 in total to A, C, and E with compensation for loss caused by the explosion of the instant case, and paid KRW 3,407,071 in total to F on October 14, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 4 through 7 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence 8-1, and Gap evidence 9 through 14, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion - The Defendant is an insurer of gas liability insurance, which is the insured of the said G’s liquefied petroleum gas sales and charging business.

- The explosion accident of this case is caused by the separation of gas valves and PVC pipes due to negligence that H, a liquefied petroleum gas supplier, failed to perform its duty to inspect gas facilities.

- Therefore, the Plaintiff paid the insurance money to the Defendant.