logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.06.14 2018노512
자동차관리법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal - The lower court’s punishment is too heavy.

2. In comparison with the judgment of the court below, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions, and the reason why the defendant claims on the grounds of appeal is already considered by the court below.

In full view of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., including the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to punishment due to the violation of the Automobile Management Act, the crime of violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act by changing the number plate of the registration of the motor vehicle in the past and operating the motor vehicle without permission, etc., the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion because the sentencing of the lower court is too excessive, and thus, exceeded the reasonable scope of its discretion.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow