logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고정1556
의료법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an intention to operate E in the five floors of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building.

1. From December 30, 2014 to October 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the website of the Ministry of Home Affairs, “The reason why the E Department has been subject to the side effects of § 422(a) for ten years; (b) unlike the large-scale factory design, the Defendant had the opportunity to implement the system as a customer payment system by means of a public prosecutor, counseling, surgery, post management. Unlike the large-scale factory design, the Defendant was aware of the fact that: (c) on December 30, 2014, the Defendant has been implementing the system as a sole basis for 1:1; and (d) on December 30, 2015, at least three times, the most important visual test in the Labac operation, such as a self-cacacaca (i.e., 1.) the side effects of other hospitals; (v) the side effects of other hospitals upon request for re-operation, and (v) the effect of advertising and trust to guarantee consumers.”

2. For the same period, the Defendant advertised on the website of the Ministry of Home Affairs and Home Affairs, “Immmpis recognized by the world at the beginning/the lowest/the beginning/the beginning of the world” and advertised contents that are not objectively recognized or without grounds.

3. The Defendant posted an advertisement on the Internet “F” website for the same period of time stating “scopic correction surgery specialists” in each history of G head of G and A head of G, even though there is no medical specialist specializing in visual correction surgery, and advertised contents that are not objectively recognized or groundless.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to output of each Internet screen;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 89 and 56 (2) 2 of the Medical Service Act (including advertisements with contents likely to mislead consumers) of the same Act, and Articles 89 and 56 (2) 7 of the same Act of each Medical Service Act are not recognized or there is no ground for such advertisement;

arrow